CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1Background of the study

Beginning from the early 1950s, various models have been used in the government of Local Communities in our country.  Among the models which have at one time been adopted for all or some parts of the Country include:The Lugardian native authority system, the American Council manager model and divisional administrative system.  These various systems were however abolished following the 1976 nation-wide local government by General Murtala Mohammed (The then Head of State).  This reform for the first time introduced a Uniform, one tier, all purpose Local government system across the country.  It was meant to correct the well known defects of the previous system such as; Lack of autonomy, encroachment upon local government function by the state Governments, inadequate funding and lack of adequate qualified man power, how staffing morale and decreasing productivity.The local government institution is perhaps the oldest formal institution nearest to the ordinary Nigeria, especially since the official colonial imposition of 1900.  In historical discourse, local government connotes formal institution which performs primary public functions closest to the people.  It is therefore a primary channel through which the citizens participate in the governance of the society.  Essentially, the essence at political participation in Nigeria is therefore to give the broad mass of Nigerian people the opportunity to get involved in duties and privileges of the democratic process and thereby establishing a new political order capable of ensuring following:

A   Justice

B   Creates orientation awareness and political mobilization 

C   Opportunity for the people to participate in the decision making process and

D   A new social and on equitable distribution of national resources and opportunities. All these require that people select and control their political authority created at the local community level to serve the needs and interests of the Local people.   It is designed to bring government nearer to the people government in the process of government, thus Oyediran view local government as “government in which popular participation, both in choice of decision makes and in the decision making process is conducted by local bodies which while recognizing the supremacy of the central government is able and willing to accept responsibility for its decision”.Local government posse’s characteristics which put it in an appropriate position to serve as a means for social mobilization.In the first, it is government that is nearest to the people and has face-to face relationship with the people, it possesses the first hand knowledge, and feels the most impact, of the people’s needs and aspirations.  Accordingly, the Political Bureau Report correctly observed that “a government operating at the local government’s level is more likely to be attuned to the needs of the people”

Secondly, since local Government is generally community based, there is a greater sense of we feeling among the people of the local area.  This sense of “we feeling fosters commitment to common cause that makes the mobilization of the people to participate in politics possible.Thirdly, since local government is based on small units of local needs, it engenders greater participation of local people in the management of their affairs.  This principle of mass participation is central in the objectives of the local Government reforms of 1976 which among its objectives are to our society and to mobiles of the members of the public in their development activities.  Fourthly, the local government, as a creative of the central (State) government, can be employed to achieve the ideological purpose of the state system at the grassroots level.  It was argued that since local government is located in areas of local isolation and traditionalism requiring a high level of political socialization, its role in social mobilization is considered to be crucial and pivotal.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Statistically stated, it is an established fact that about 70 percent of the Nigeria population lives in the rural areas hence the grassroots.   Given the scope of this study, this percentage of our population has under a measure of neglect which today is a source of concern.  Over the years, tiers of government have be emerged as a consequence of the evolution of the political process in Nigeria.  This can be traced through the colonial, independence era and the post independence era.  The evolution of these tiers of government has engendered political participation with both positives and negative consequence.  Some scholars view political participation as an outgrowth of the evolution of local government in Nigeria, others view it as a consequence of government actions or policies on the trends of the political system.

Others view political participation as an outgrowth of military involvement and civil life.  These over the nature of local government with regards to the character of political participation.  The impact of the local government on grassroots’ democracy has not been facilitated and given greater emphasis; the local government according to John Stuart Mill is justified as an integral part of democracy.This paper is therefore, an attempt to access the roles played by local government in the democratization process aimed at re-adjusting the organizational structure and institutions and then making the ordinary man at local governments to participation more in political processes.   It is also an attempt to access the collective role expected of the people at the local government in the democratic government as a means of achieving this adjustment.For a more critical analysis of these research problems since research questions shall be deduced so as to keep out though abreast with the topic.    This research problem therefore, necessitated the following research questions:

a. To what extent do the activities of local government affect the peoples’ 
      political participation?

b. How has the role played by local government in integrating the rural 
    population into the political process engendered political participation?

c. What possible alternatives exist to ensuring political participation in the political system ?

d. To what extent has the application of local government democracy?

    Influenced peoples’ participation in democratic process?   

e. To what extent has the application of grassroots democracy influenced p
     people participation in democratic process?

1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The major objectives of the study are:

1.  To ascertain whether grassroots democracy refers to the active involvement and participation of the rural dwellers or the common folks in the determination and implementation of public politics 

2.   To ascertain whether participation in politics by voting during election reflect as public politics

3.   To ascertain whether there is efficient representation and popular participation in politics in local government

4.   To ascertain whether local government politics encourage democratic freedom

1.4 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

For the successful completion of the study, the following research hypotheses were formulated by the researcher; 

H0: there is no efficient representation and popular participation in politics in local government.

H1: there is efficient representation and popular participation in politics in local government

H02: local government politics does not encourage democratic freedom

H2:local government politics encourage democratic freedom

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

With the world contending towards democratic process, if therefore becomes very imperative to give greater concern to local government in Nigeria as a mere pragmatic means achieving a viable political order.     Following from this premise, the research study is designed to serve as an exposure to the mass of Nigeria on the imperative of local government democracy.  It is expected that this study will go a big way in making local government participation in politics heritage of the rural common folk.  The research work is going to be a compendium of useful information to both students and any person who might have a need for it.Ultimately, it is my cherished desire to contribute to the growth of intellectual and material deposit of this schools library considering its peculiar nature.

1.6 SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

In spite of the fact that the scope of this research study embraces the entity called Nigeria local government, the limitation of this study which has to do with the period of time to be covered on  the process is from 1776 to 1993, that is to say that it begins with General Murtala Mohammed’s’ administration. The researcher encounters some constrain which limited the scope of the study;

a) AVAILABILITY OF RESEARCH MATERIAL: The research material available to the researcher is insufficient, thereby limiting the study

b) TIME: The time frame allocated to the study does not enhance wider coverage as the researcher has to combine other academic activities and examinations with the study.

c) Organizational privacy: Limited Access to the selected auditing firm makes it difficult to get all the necessary and required information concerning the activities.

 

 

 

 

1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS

In an attempt to avoid any form of ambiguity in the course of this writing, it therefore becomes very important to define some of the salient concept used in the research study

Local Government:

By local Government is generally meant a system of territorial Units with defined boundaries a legal identity and institutional structure, power and duties laid down in general and special status and a degree of financial and others autonomy.

 DEMOCRACY:

In spite of the fact that the concept of democracy on its own is ambiguous in any or most political discussions leading to a conglomeration of definitions.Functional definition thus:  It could be defined or seen as a concept concerned with the national political system based on Citizens participation majority rule, constitution and discussion.

 GRASSROOTS:

Clearly speaking, the word used to capture two meanings at the same one is that, it represents the Nigeria Masses or common folk, especially those living in the rural areas.  Two is that, it represents the lowest rung of government in the Country, which is local government.

 LOCAL GOVERNEMT DEMOCRACY:

This refers to the popular democratic participation in major decisions at the broadest forms of political associations.  It therefore encourages democracy in its largest sense as a state of affairs in which most citizens especially at the village and town level participation.

PARTICIPATION:

Participation is the ability and opportunity of a group of people to be involved in governance.  Participation can be defined as an act of involvement.  I  can also be defined as an act of membership or belonging and taking part in the act of leaderships.  The need exists for the citizenry to participate in governance, contribute to the essence of governance that is to help in the regulation of individuals conducts in the society and provide for security and his good thing of life for the people. The participation is the people are therefore a sinequa non-for the pursuit of good government.  By an act of participation, one tries to seek and influence or support government and politics.   The participation can either be direct or indirect by observing and making contributions to the act of governance.  It is through this participation method that government can hope to realize its objectives of being responsive to the wishes of the people.

 POLITICS:

This could be referred to as science or act of government.   Different scholars have made various attempts at defining politics.  They have conceptualize such  scholars include Hugo Hedo, Charles Hynemen, Claude Ake, Okwudiba Nnoli, David Easton, Harlod Lasswell, etc.

From their submissions, their views and meaning of politics could be summed up as follows:

A Politics as a pursuit of public interest

B Politics as the operation of state Craft

C Politics as the authoritative allocation of values.

D Politics as the implementation and execution of public policy.

E Politics as who gets what, when and how?

   Major exponent of this view is Harold Lasswell.  Politics is at work when a group of people in trying to score an advantage over their opponent tries to outwit or out serve or scheme out or outsmart one group to the advantage of the other.  

1.8 ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY

This research work is organized in five chapters, for easy understanding, as follows

Chapter one is concern with the introduction, which consist of the (overview, of the study), historical background, statement of problem, objectives of the study, research hypotheses, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study, definition of terms and historical background of the study. Chapter two highlights the theoretical framework on which the study is based, thus the review of related literature. Chapter three deals on the research design and methodology adopted in the study. Chapter four concentrate on the data collection and analysis and presentation of finding.  Chapter five gives summary, conclusion, and recommendations made of the study

---